Appeals Court
Docket: AC-59
Parties
Steph,.
Plaintiff
Attorney: Not Assigned
VS.
Department of Justice
Defendant
Attorney: Not Assigned
Hearing Details
Type of Hearing Appeal
Hearing Location Not Scheduled
Date Scheduled Not Scheduled
Time Scheduled Not Scheduled
Submitted 19th June 2026, 20:37 PM UTC 2 months ago
Court Outcome Dismissed
Information
Appeal Type
Ban on Sight
Explain why your appeal should be successful
Appealing on behalf of slazengers. States he should be removed from the ban on sight list as he no longer affiliated with the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) owned by "The-Institute" or "The-Government".
Justification for the Action you're appealing
Would like to visit the White House again. See https://prnt.sc/ohaoBJgoqiGf, https://prnt.sc/_WEtSaVWbwOe, and https://prnt.sc/wonaIqdbzaKP
Evidence
Restricted Evidence: Evidence has been submitted for this case but has not been released publicly. Only authorised personnel can view it.
Court Opinion
Written by ICEMAN. 22nd June 2026, 21:40 PM UTC
Notice of Declination

Following review by the Department of Justice, this matter has been declined pursuant to Prosecution Act 2025, Part 4, Section 2, Sub-section 1; also Section 3 and Section 4.

Accordingly, the Department of Justice will not proceed with this matter at this time.

The Appellant shall submit his case himself, If wont or can't, then use the Anonymous Submission or Whistleblowing Option not another user.

Kind regards,

ICEMAN
Attorney General
Department of Justice