Response
-
Response By: ICEMAN.
-
Response At: 30/Jun/2026 05:30 PM UTC
PUBLIC REPORT OF THE ETHICS BOARD
REGARDING THE CERTIFICATION OF EVIDENCE FOR A BAN ON SIGHT REQUEST
Matter: Ethics Board Review of Evidence Submitted in Relation to a Ban on Sight Request
I. Members of the Ethics Board
The following members were present and participated in the review of this matter:
*ICEMAN — Chairman of the Board
* xXLaurenXx. — Deputy Chairman of the Board
* Xcleb — Member
* AmazingConnor — Member
* OllieSafe — Member
* hexal — Member
* Seas. — Member
II. Purpose of the Report
Pursuant to the reporting requirements governing the Ethics Board, this public report is issued following the Board’s decision regarding the certification of evidence submitted for review.
The Department of Justice respectfully submitted this matter to the Ethics Board following allegations raised by the Department of Defense concerning the conduct of certain accused organisations and their affiliated members.
The Department of Defense requested that appropriate action be taken to impose a Ban on Sight Order against the accused organisations and their members on the grounds of Terroristic Conduct, as outlined under Part 2, Section 1, Subsection 1 of the Defence Act 2025.
III. Evidence in Question
The evidence placed before the Ethics Board concerned allegations that the accused organisations and their affiliated members engaged in a mass, coordinated, and systematic abuse of the Habbo reporting mechanism, which allegedly resulted in the unjust suspension of the White House Headquarters.
According to the Department of Defense, the conduct in question was not accidental or incidental. Rather, the Department of Defense alleged that the conduct appeared to be deliberate, organised, and carried out with hostile intent against the White House institution.
The evidence was submitted for the purpose of determining whether it should be certified for use in relation to the requested Ban on Sight proceedings.
IV. Ethics Board Vote
Following review and consideration of the submitted material, the Ethics Board voted as follows:
Votes in Favor of Certifying the Evidence: 7
Votes Opposed to Certifying the Evidence:0
Total Votes Cast: 7
The decision of the Ethics Board was unanimous.
V. Certification Decision
Based on the unanimous vote of the Ethics Board, the evidence was:
CERTIFIED
Accordingly, the evidence may be relied upon for the relevant legal or procedural purpose connected to the Ban on Sight request, subject to any applicable evidentiary rules, court procedure, or further review required under White House law.
VI. Summary of Arguments
A. Argument in Favor of Certification
Those in favor of certifying the evidence found that the submitted material was sufficiently relevant to the allegations raised by the Department of Defense.
The supporting position was that the evidence appeared to show conduct directed toward the White House as an organisation and toward its members. The material also appeared to indicate coordination, hostility, and conduct relevant to the concerns underlying the requested Ban on Sight Order.
It was further considered that the alleged abuse of the Habbo reporting mechanism, if established, could demonstrate organised conduct intended to disrupt the normal functioning of the White House and interfere with its institutional operations.
B. Argument Opposed to Certification
No members of the Ethics Board voted against certification.
As such, there was no formal opposing vote recorded. However, the Board acknowledges that all evidence submitted for certification must still be reviewed carefully, with attention to reliability, relevance, context, and compliance with applicable evidentiary standards.
VII. Final Notes from Members of the Board
No separate final notes were submitted by members of the Ethics Board for inclusion in this public report.
VIII. Final Statement from the Attorney General
Having reviewed the material submitted before the Ethics Board, I am satisfied that the evidence should be certified.
On that basis, I believe the evidence meets the required standard. The material appears to show conduct directed toward the White House as an organisation, as well as toward its members. It also indicates a level of coordination, hostility, and recruitment activity that is relevant to the concerns underlying the requested Ban on Sight Order.
In my view, the material is sufficiently connected to the alleged Terroristic Conduct identified under the Defence Act 2025.
On my personal behalf, I wish to state that I fully respect the views and positions expressed by the other members of the Ethics Board in this matter. I recognise that each member reviewed the evidence from their own perspective and formed their view in good faith.
The Department of Justice remains committed to due process, evidentiary integrity, and the fair administration of White House law. This report is issued in the interest of transparency, accountability, and the proper functioning of the Ethics Board process.
Issued by:
ICEMAN
Attorney General
Chairman of the Ethics Board
Department of Justice
Habbo White House