Court Opinion
Written by dreckly
25th May 2026, 15:10 PM UTC
Concerning the matter of AC-29 - Sirrig req. removal from SS Branch’s Hiring Blacklist.
Justices Presiding:
Chief Justice dreckly
Deputy Chief Justice Kelpti
Associate Justice Steph,.
Replacement Justices O.stuart.O & Hexal
Verdict
Following the proceedings, the justices voted as follows:
In favour of removal: 1
Against removal: 4
Majority Opinion
Those of us who held the majority opinion, that Sirrig should not be removed from the SS Hiring Blacklist, first considered that one of the key points made by the appellant's counsel during the proceedings were that the correct procedures had not been appropriately followed during the termination of the appellant’s employment and invalid reasoning was used for his addition to the hiring blacklist.
The statements that the appellant had made in court were also considered where he showed remorse and that his actions had been a necessary and measured response to the frustrations that he had experienced during his employment. The appellant also felt that he had not been adequately supported during his time in the White House and thus should be given a second chance to start again with the clean slate.
With regards to the first point, his legal representation failed to provide any, legally acceptable evidence - one piece in total was submitted, which was successfully objected to by the counsel for the respondent on the grounds of “Lack of Foundation” as the evidence did not comply with Part 6, Section 1 and Section 2 of the Prosecution Act and it had not been subsequently reviewed by an ethics board, per the requirements under Part 7 for evidence which does not comply with Part 6 of the same.
We also took into consideration events that had been witnessed by persons serving on the bench whereby the appellant had entered the White House Headquarters, following the postponement of his initial hearing date and time, spamming the room using all capital letters, coloured chat and insulting members of the supreme bench.
On consideration of all the facts of the case, it was the majority opinion that the appellant should remain on the SS branch’s hiring blacklist.
Dissenting Opinion
No dissenting opinion was provided for this verdict.
Justices of the Court.
