Appeals Court
Docket: AC-112
Parties
BillyKhn
Plaintiff
Attorney: Not Assigned
VS.
Department of Justice
Defendant
Attorney: Not Assigned
Hearing Details
Type of Hearing Appeal
Hearing Location Not Scheduled
Date Scheduled Not Scheduled
Time Scheduled Not Scheduled
Submitted 18th July 2026, 23:03 PM UTC 1 month ago
Court Outcome Dismissed
Information
Appeal Type
Demotion
Explain why your appeal should be successful
I believe my appeal should be successful because the dismissal taken against me was based on incomplete or inaccurate information. I respectfully maintain that I did not intentionally violate any rules or policies, and I believe the evidence available does not support the severity of the punishment imposed.

Throughout my time in the White House, I have consistently contributed positively to the community and carried out my duties to the best of my ability. Any actions that may have been misunderstood were not done with malicious intent, nor were they intended to harm the organisation or its members.

I am requesting that my case be reviewed objectively, taking into account all available evidence, my prior record, and the circumstances surrounding the incident. I believe that a full review will demonstrate that the punishment was either unwarranted or excessive in relation to the alleged offence.

For these reasons, I respectfully ask that my appeal be granted and that the disciplinary action be removed.
Justification for the Action you're appealing
The action being appealed was taken on the basis that I was allegedly associated with a mafia organisation. I believe this action was unjustified because I was not a member of any mafia group at the time of the allegation.

Prior to joining the Foreign Service, I was completely transparent about my previous badge affiliations and discussed them with Vimto. During that conversation, I was instructed to remove the badges in question, and I immediately agreed and complied with that instruction.

I acted in good faith, was honest about the situation from the outset, and complied with the instructions given to me. Given that I was open about the matter and took the required corrective action when asked, I do not believe the disciplinary action accurately reflects the circumstances of the case.
Evidence
Restricted Evidence: Evidence has been submitted for this case but has not been released publicly. Only authorised personnel can view it.
Court Opinion
Written by saintpaulbb 21st July 2026, 21:44 PM UTC
The Department of Justice hereby announces that Appeal AC-112 has been denied and closed following a review of the submission and the applicable provisions of the Prosecution Act 2025.

Upon examination, it was determined that the appeal did not fall within the scope of matters eligible for review through a Complaint of Appeal (CoA).

Under Part II, Section I(1)(1) of the Prosecution Act 2025, a CoA is reserved for individuals appealing a Training Kick on Sight (TKoS), National Punishment (NP), Ban on Sight (BoS), or Branch Blacklist.

As the matter presented in AC-112 does not concern any of the aforementioned actions, the Department lacks the authority to proceed with the appeal under the established statutory framework.

Consequently, the appeal has been denied on procedural grounds.

This decision does not prevent the claimant from pursuing other remedies available under Department of Justice procedures, including the filing of a criminal case should sufficient grounds exist.

Accordingly, Appeal AC-112 is hereby closed.
Respectfully,
notsyam

Solicitor General
Justice

Useful Links

Disclaimer

TheHabboWH.org is not affiliated with, endorsed, sponsored, or specifically approved by Sulake Corporation Oy or its Affiliates. TheHabboWH.org may use the trademarks and other intellectual property of Habbo, which is permitted under Habbo Fan Site Policy.

© Habbo White House, 2026
Developed With By Owen?.