Supreme Court
Docket: SC-103
Parties
notsyam
REQ.
Supreme Court
Hearing Details
Type of Hearing Request
Hearing Location Not Scheduled
Date Scheduled Not Scheduled
Time Scheduled Not Scheduled
Submitted 8th July 2026, 04:15 AM UTC 2 months ago
Court Outcome Settled
Information
🇺🇸 | OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001
RE: Interpretation Request

Honourable Justices of the Court,

I respectfully request an interpretation of the Prosecution Act 2025, Part I, Section 2, Subsection 2.

The subsection states:

"A member of the Department of Justice shall represent the following people, unless their representation is refused;"

• Any member of the Executive Office of the President;
• Any Branch Leader or Deputy Branch Leader;
• Any Cabinet Department Leader, as defined by the President, Vice President, or Chief of Staff.

My query relates specifically to the phrase "unless their representation is refused."

It is my current reading that this clause applies to the individuals expressly listed within the subsection, granting them the ability to refuse representation provided by the Department of Justice.

However, I seek clarification as to whether this right extends beyond those listed categories. The Act does not appear to explicitly state whether other individuals may refuse Department of Justice representation and elect to represent themselves before the Court.

As such, I respectfully request the Court's interpretation on whether:

The ability to refuse representation is limited to the individuals listed in Part I, Section 2, Subsection 2; or

Any individual may refuse Department of Justice representation and proceed on a self-represented basis where representation would otherwise be available.

Clarification on this matter would assist the Department of Justice in ensuring the consistent application of the Prosecution Act moving forward.

Signed,

notsyam
Solicitor General
Evidence
Restricted Evidence: Evidence has been submitted for this case but has not been released publicly. Only authorised personnel can view it.
Court Opinion
Written by dreckly 14th August 2026, 19:25 PM UTC
The petitioner is requesting the Supreme Court to interpret and provide a clear definition of Part 1, Section 2(2) of the Prosecution Act 2025.

MAJORITY OPINION.—
It is of the majority opinion that this is outlining who the Attorney and Solicitor Generals MUST represent unless refused, not whom may opt out of representation.

The Prosecution Act 2025 goes further in Part 4, Section 1, Subsection 2 stating “The Department of Justice shall assign an Attorney to both parties, unless representation is refused”

The Department of Justice is required to assign a Certified Attorney to both the Plaintiff and Defendant unless said party refuses.

This interpretations majority opinion came from dreckly the Chief Justice, alongside Deputy Chief Justice Kelpti, Senior Associate Justice Steph,., Senior Associate Justice Faaaaiiitthh, Associate Justice saintpaulbb, Associate Justice Brokyy_, Associate Justice Inconclusive-, Associate Justice GreenArcher, and Associate Justice Pawtistic.
Justice

Useful Links

Disclaimer

TheHabboWH.org is not affiliated with, endorsed, sponsored, or specifically approved by Sulake Corporation Oy or its Affiliates. TheHabboWH.org may use the trademarks and other intellectual property of Habbo, which is permitted under Habbo Fan Site Policy.

© Habbo White House, 2026
Developed With By Owen?.